Top 10 Badass Pokémon (Who Actually Suck)

Updated on July 5, 2020
Jeremy Gill profile image

In between Pokémon journeys, Jeremy enjoys working as a pharmaceutical chemist and campus manager.

Pokémon Designs

As Pokémon gain experience, they evolve into stronger, usually more intimidating forms, leading to some awesome designs. But you can't always judge a book by its cover; several ferocious-looking fighters are surprisingly lackluster when their stats, types, and abilities are put to the test—which companions fail to impress? Here are ten sleek yet fragile Pokémon!


10. Regigigas

Type: Normal

At first, Regigigas seems amazing—he's the first Normal legendary, the leader of the Hoenn Regi trio, and he wields a mighty 670 stat total 670—what's not to like?

Well, Normal doesn't offer much offensive power (it's not a very useful same-type attack bonus), but the real problem is his terrible Slow Start ability. This halves Gigas's attack and speed for the first five turns he's in battle, making him surprisingly slow and underpowered. Heck, even Bulbapedia (the biggest Pokémon wiki) notes he has more in common with Slaking (who can only attack every other turn) than most legendaries.

At the end of the day, he's still better than some non-legendaries by sheer stat totals (his defenses are solid), but one of if not the worst mythical Pokémon.


9. Sharpedo

Type: Water/Dark

I really want to like Sharpedo, both because of his fierce design and strengths: he has no quad weaknesses, several resistances, fair abilities, great attack with decent speed, and a solid mega form. So what's the issue?

Well, his overall stat total is only 460, but more than that, Sharpedo has terrible defense and special defense (40 in each, worse even than Charmander), meaning he just can't take hits. And while his typing has several resistances, it also has many weaknesses, so it's not hard for savvy trainers to exploit, and a poor move pool doesn't help.

Sharpedo might be passable for the main quest if you're dead-set on him, but when it comes to competitive battling, he's not up to par, especially with Greninja offering a much better Water/Dark creature once gen 6 hit.


8. Weavile

Type: Dark/Ice

Sneasel looked cool when he debuted in generation 2, showcasing its then-new Dark type, but his poor stat total and bad typing greatly hindered him. In generation 4, he gained Weavile as a new evolution, which improves his stat total, but maintains his typing issues—Ice is terrible on defense, and coupled with Dark, you've got a quad weakness to common Fighting attacks, plus weaknesses to Rock, Bug, Fairy, and more.

Throw in poor defenses and lackluster abilities and Weavile's a glass cannon, able to maybe get one decent hit in before falling.


7. Scyther

Type: Bug/Flying

Scyther just looks awesome, easily one of the coolest Bug-types with his arm-blades. His stat total is fair if not great at 500, but I do like its allocation, neglecting special attack to favor speed and physical attack. However, it's still outdone by many other sweepers, and Bug/Flying is a bad type combo with a quad weakness to Rock (another popular aggro type) plus several other elements.

To be fair, Scyther gained new evolution Scizor when gen 2 came out. And while Scizor's Bug/Steel typing is better, it still has a quad weakness (Fire) and is almost more an alternate form than a true evolution, as his stat total remains at 500. Scizor's also tricky to get, requiring you to trade Scyther while he holds a Metal Coat item.


6. Exploud

Type: Normal

Both intimidating and a little silly at the same time, Exploud is the final form of Whismur, evolving from Loudred at level 40. But despite his three-tier family and late evolution level, his base stat total is a mediocre 480 (490 as of gen 46)—not dreadful, but far from good. The stat allocation is bad too, as they're fairly evenly spread (slightly favoring attack), preventing Exploud from having a clear role in battle.

Plus, his damage is hindered by the fact that he'll never get both STAB and weakness damage (since nothing is weak to Normal, using it for STAB won't hit any weaknesses). Add in lackluster abilities and there just isn't any reason to pick Exploud over better options.


5. Marowak

Type: Ground (Alolan form is Ghost/Fire)

Marowak gained fame as the Pokémon Team Rocket kills in Lavender Tower, where players battle her ghost. While tragic, it showcases her resilience and spirit, and many years after gen 1, she would gain a new Ghost/Fire Alolan form in gen 7.

But no matter which one you use, Marowak just isn't good. With a mere stat total of 425, she feels like a mid-way evolution rather than a final form (some believe she might have been intended as the pre-evolution of Kangaskhan), and Ground just isn't a great defensive type. To be fair, Cubone and Marowak are the only creatures who can equip the Thick Club held item, which doubles their physical attack, but it's just not the third form the family needs to stay relevant.


4. Tropius

Type: Grass/Flying

With new units like Tropius and Sceptile, Hoenn introduced some awesome-looking Grass dinos, but unlike Sceptile, Tropius is bad. Like, really bad. His stats don't match his appearance, falling at a mere 460, and like Exploud, they lack focus, making Tropius below-average at everything, especially speed.

His typing makes things worse, bearing a quad weakness to Ice (another prevalent attack type), plus weaknesses to Rock, Fire, and more, with few resistances to balance it out. Tropius really needs a new evolution or at least mega form to have any role in battle, but to his credit, he does make a good HM slave, able to learn Flash, Cut, Fly, and Rock Smash. However, since HMs aren't needed as of gen 7, even this small saving grace is no longer relevant.


3. Mightyena

Type: Dark

Most games offer early-accessible single-evolution mammals who work okay in the short term but lag behind the farther you quest, like Raticate, Furret, and Bibarel. Both Linoone and Mightyena fill that role for Hoenn; you'll score Mighty by leveling a Poochyena to 18.

But other than a fast evolution, Mightyena has little going for it, with a pathetic 420 stat total that's too evenly-distributed to be interesting, and ever since Fairy-types arose in gen 6, Dark has another weakness to worry about. While I do like Mightyena's Intimidate ability, automatically lowering your foe's attack when he enters battle, it's far too little for another creature who desperately needs a third evolution.


2. Abomnasnow

Type: Grass/Ice

With a unique yeti-like design and new type pairing, Abomnasnow showed promise, and he wields an excellent ability: Snow Warning. This automatically causes hail weather, which damages non-Ice types, and Abomnasnow also a mega form to consider.

But things go sour from there: stat total is only a fair 494, and yet again, it's too balanced; with even attack and special attack, Abomnasnow can hit either up-close or indirectly but excels at neither. He also has a late evolution at level 40, and one of the game's worst type pairings, bearing a quad weakness to Fire plus weaknesses to Rock, Fighting, and many more, so he won't last long enough to make good use of his free hailstorm.


1. Glalie

Type: Ice

Glalie looks awesome, and his shiny form gives him glowing red eyes for an even scarier design, but he's just not worth it. He doesn't evolve from Snorunt until level 42, and even then, you've only got a stat total of 480, with the points completely evenly spread, 80 in everything. So while there aren't any glaring flaws, there aren't any big strengths either.

Ice is a good aggro type, but it's easily the worst defensive element in the game, only resisting itself yet having four weaknesses, and none of Glalie's abilities pick up the slack. A mega form and alternate evolution path (leading to Ice/Ghost Froslass) are better than nothing, but not enough to save this deceivingly-cool slacker.

Which Pokémon do you think is worst?

See results

Gauging a Pokémon's Power

With many mechanics involved in battles, Pokémon are often more than they appear. Maybe one's stat total isn't great, but it's spread well, or maybe they have an excellent ability/type pairing to balance it out.

Yet today's slackers need a boost, whether a simple stat increase, new evolution, or alternate form, to help their bite match their bark. But for now, vote for your weakest link and I'll see you at our next Pokémon countdown!

© 2020 Jeremy Gill


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment
    • profile image

      Arkon da construtktor 

      4 weeks ago

      Add rowlet, but not dratrix. Rowlet falls to some terribly strong types.


    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

    Show Details
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)